Misinformation
Global warming is the biggest misinformation scam I've ever encountered. Yes temperatures are increasing, yes I too thought it was due to us not so long ago. Then the best scientists in the world came public, and their data is researchable by almost anyone. The short version; CO2 doesn't cause global warming, al gore blatantly twisted the ice core data which the very scientist that gave him the data are rather upset about. In addition the storms will actually get BETTER as the temperature increases, and just so as you know it is a long way from it's high. The evidence does not support humans being the cause of the rise, nor did it support humans being the cause of the fall a few decades ago. The main culprit? Solar activity or lack of, depending if the temp is going up or down. There is a bbc special on all this which I encourage anyone that reads this to watch. Here on 7-7-07 a giant concert is occuring for "climate change", which is ironic because if they were right the resources involved in the concert would cause more change than it ever prevented, but they are blatantly wrong. The facts do not support the belief, but tens of thousands of peoples jobs depend on it being true. Please.. please educate everyone you can. Entire continents are being kept in suffering because we won't allow them to develop due to "environmental concerns" of their industrial revolutions. I don't doubt certain aspects of scientific and engineering progress will also be kept at a halt or slowed down due to it.
PS: Speaking of 7-7-07, more people are getting married today than any other day. Why? To be lucky. I bet 8-7-07 has the most annulements.
Life
Life is a strange thing, sitting here at age 24 I know that, barring any absurd advances in medical technology, I statistically won't be here in 40-60 years. I think it was sometime in my teens I became morbid, and was horrified of this fact. Now I'm not so much afraid, but the thought still makes me feel sick to my stomach and sometimes it is one I can't turn off. I know we all die, being born means you have to die. I don't believe in any meaningful sense of reincarnation or an afterlife.. that is to say if there is an afterlife the experience must necessarily be so fundamentally different an experience that if "I" were in it, I would rapidly cease to be "me", so much so that for all intents and purposes "I" am dead regardless.
Some people instead take comfort in living on through the memories of others, this isn't really living on though,
and it's also incredibly short. What were the names of your grand-grand-parents? What about their parents? Chances are you don't know, and even if you do you probably don't actually know anything about them. To be fair you never met them as I never met mine.
I also point out that any advance akin to what I mentioned above won't actually help. Living to 200 isn't any
better per sey, only profound increases substantially alter our temporary experience.
What is someone to do? What CAN someone do? I didn't choose to be born, because there was no me to make
such a choice. Now that a body has been born and become me, I simply don't want to die, at least not anytime soon, but, much like being born, that isn't a choice I get. Which is fine, but how do I get that feeling out of the pit of my stomach then? How do I enjoy my life and the events in it amidst nihilistic knowledge?
Wayne on AI
Being interested in robotics I get to hear a lot of arguments about what robots can or can't do, especially regarding robot intelligence. I will now clarify my opinion:
1) There is virtually nothing we can do that a robot couldn't hypothetically do better and faster.
2) That includes, provided the human race doesn't kill itself before developing the appropriate technology, thinking and conciousness.
Most people are not aware just how advanced technology already is. We have a robot that speaks perfectly (in Japanese, but nonetheless), a robot that recognizes itself in the mirror, artificial brains that can learn to read from scratch on their own, artificial brains that can learn to predict the stock market with better accuracy than entire teams of experienced wall street advisors, artificial brains that can perform quick and accurate medical diagnosis, etc etc etc. We have limited self-propigating learning systems which are essentially identical to the early (fetal) human brain. We have AI which passes the turing test for 2-3 year old humans (that means that adult humans talking to the AI can not tell the difference between it and a 2-3 year old child).
People are going to be hit in the face with a lot of these things very soon. There is a very high potential for household affordable machines which are equal to adult human brains in the next 30ish years. There is a very high potential at least one super computer will well exceed that capacity and be well on the way to developing even better intelligences, resulting in a singularity event.
This scares many people, putting things out of our hands in a sense. However I try to be more optimistic, the moment our species picked up a rock or a stick our evolution became technological rather than purely biological, and this is just the next step. There is a risk of harm yes, but the potential for improvement via this path is nearly infinite. Also, at very least, I think it will shut up the fundamentalist, after all once something other than human is on our level the whole god's image thing loses a lot of thrust. Here is where most people will say that computers will always be, at best, simulations of our grandeur, that we can never know they actually think. To those people I point out that you can never know humans, or even your own brain, are actually thinking.
job
Yay
Found a place to live, room in a house including everything (heat, water, laundry, electricity, cable, internet) 15-20 min walk from Algonquin for $375. Not exactly what I was hoping, but it's also $250-300 less a month than a bachelor apt.
bloody hell
So here I am, usask telling me my transcript arrived too late, getting all set for Algonquin in Ottawa, life is good. Then today I get an acceptance letter from USask for the Bachelor of Science in Engineering program. So it's 4 years there for a degree, or 4 terms in Ottawa for a diploma with an option to do 2 more years in Thunder Bay for a degree if I want it. The cost is about the same either way, the amount of time is the same. Algonquin gets me potentially two pieces of paper, but restricts my options slightly. USask has lots of options, but if I'm tired of it 2 years in I get nothing.
I'm thinking Algonquin wins here, now if only they would tell me if the give credit for prior courses.
Just for fun
So I have a lot of free time it seems. Since I don't think I can afford to take a proper program in physics/math, even a cheap one from Unisa (south africa) while I'm doing my robotics program, I've decided just to do it on my own. That's really how I learn best, and I'm pretty sure I could just rock the GRE or something if I wanted to get into academic physics again. I left because Dal had a screwed up alignment between math and physics departments when I enrolled, and I didn't have the mathematical confidence I do now.
I'll be working through the Motion Mountain text ( http://motionmountain.dse.nl/welcome.html ) , free online math text ( http://www.math.gatech.edu/~cain/textbooks/onlinebooks.html) , my hard copy text books, and the library if need be. A lot of it will be review and should come quickly, plus I pretty much love the more advanced stuff. So.. here goes.
Stuff
I am not at all affiliated with "Wayne's Place" restaurant in Hamilton. Yes, google ads thinks I am, but google ads is wrong. I have changed my blog title to help avoid this.
Instead..
Engagement?
I've also been thinking about Jen a lot lately. We're nearing 9 months together, which in the scheme of things isn't very much. However I love her in ways I've never loved anyone else before, she supports me in everything I do, puts up with my shananigans, and goes to efforts to make sure I feel loved too. To top things off, she would make a fantastic mother.
In short, I want to marry this woman. I've know this for a long time, but I also know there is some sort of pseudo-rules about how long people should be together first and what not. Chemically speaking I'm confident this has been enough time for the initial lust stage to run its course.
So how long is right? There are the typical bullshit answers "when it feels right", etc. I think the jist of it is no one really knows the answer because there is no right.
I don't think I'm going to do any better than Jen. I don't really understand the point of waiting much beyond this point to ask her, but at the same time I don't want it to be rushed like so many relationships these days (I see frequent tell of getting engaged in the first 3 months, or even the first 1-4 weeks).
Created with ShoutPost